Tag Archives: animal

The Infinite Chameleon

“Here’s another metaphor for thinking about the ultimate nature of reality:

Imagine, if you will, an infinite chameleon.

Oh, common on! It’s not as ridiculous as it sounds. Put on your thinking-cap and play along.

A regular chameleon is only able change itself in one way: by changing colors. Which equals one degree of freedom. But imagine a creature which is so flexible that it’s able (somehow) to be a chameleon in every way possible. Meaning, it has infinite degrees of freedom. Imagine it could freely morph its size, shape, texture, temperature, smell, bones, cells, molecules, atoms, and even the physical laws which govern its entire being.

How could it do that?

Well… it would have to actually be limitless. As in: without limit. As in: an unlimited, all-powerful chameleon. (Don’t worry, he’s only a danger to pesky flies.)

What would such a creature look it?

Well, not much like a standard chameleon, that’s for sure. It wouldn’t even be right to call it a creature because a “creature” is a label we invented to refer to a set of certain constrains upon infinite degrees of freedom. To be a “creature” precisely means that you’re not free to be something else, like a coffee table. So this thing is not really a creature. But it’s also not a “thing”, because to be a “thing” is also a set of constrains upon infinite degrees of freedom. So this infinite chameleon would most closely resemble no-thing. Why nothing? Because, imagine that every property sort of cancels itself out by its negation, like the positive and negative integers might if you tried to add them all together.

But notice, this would not be your ordinary notion of nothingness, like some kind of black, lifeless void. Instead, imagine this “nothingness chameleon” as having infinite degrees of freedom, allowing “him” to masquerade as everything. He would be bursting at the seams with infinite potential, ready to actualize into something concrete.

So why bother calling it a chameleon then?

Because, the essence of its nature is chameleon-like to the Nth degree. Its very structure exudes illusion and misdirection, for which I think the label “chameleon” is apropos. Plus, everyone knows chameleons are cool.

Could a monster-sized infinite chameleon be hiding right under your nose right this very second?

Impossible! Unscientific! Illogical! Just a silly thought experiment! Mere philosophy! Balderdash!

Maybe. Or maybe… if you stop for a second and consciously look around you, you’ll notice that you’re inside the infinite chameleon right now! After all, where else could you be?

Perhaps you are the infinite chameleon, hiding from itself!

Granted, such a discovery would be rather implausible, outrageous, and embarrassing to admit. After all, how could a chameleon hide himself from himself? But then again, it is a chameleon we’re talking about here. Have you seen how regular chameleons hide in the jungle? They’re pretty good at it. And they’ve only mastered 1 degree of freedom. Imagine what an infinite chameleon could do to hide himself from you.

Maybe you can spot his hoof-prints in the sand 😉

P.S. The nice thing about chasing down infinite chameleons is that there can only be one of him to find 😉

P.P.S. Please don’t poke or worship the infinite chameleon. It makes him cry ;)”

Source: https://www.actualized.org/insights?p=43

If You Are Not A Wolf You Will Be Eaten By Wolves

This post is inspired by a comment on my poem called “empty beings” which included questions asked to me about this Arabian proverb. Thank you: evolutionofselffeedyourhunger.wordpress.com

"If you are not a wolf, you will be eaten by wolves ...

Arabian Proverb: “If you are not a wolf, you will be eaten by wolves.”

This Arabian proverb means to me that those who are not thinking for themselves, who are not bold and who do not speak their own truth will get eaten by those that do. The wolf is a metaphor for a alpha, free thinking human.

Would you consider yourself the Hero or Villain, why or why not?

I would consider myself the hero and the villain. I consider myself both because we live in a world of duality. I have aspects of myself that are attributes of a hero and I have the shadow aspects of myself that would be considered the villain. Someone else’s villain is another’s hero. However, overall I would consider myself as the hero archetype in the sense that I am here for the good of humanity and am a light being evolving in this universe who only wants good for all.

Now I ask the same questions to you:
What does the proverb mean to you? Would you consider yourself the hero or the villain, why or not not? Let me know in the comments.